Jump to content

Che

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    218

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Che

  1. Che
    Counted mine this morning. Twenty-three, if you're charitable about what counts as a project. @Sova — I suspect you'd know exactly which ones were worth keeping open.
  2. Che
    The type descriptions ring true enough. The neat grid, though — life doesn't really sort itself that tidily.
  3. Che
    Aye, and she probably knows it too.
  4. Che
    The distinction matters, aye, but I'm not sure it's as clean as you're drawing it. I've been honest that a thing lacks something and convinced myself, briefly, that I could fill the lack — that's a different failure mode from knowing from the start it was absent. One is hope, the other is perhaps a kind of retrospective myth-making. Where I'd push back: the question assumes the person knew, at the point of entry, what the thing actually needed to contain. Most of the time I didn't. I walked through open doors precisely because I'd not yet developed the vocabulary for what I was looking for — so the honesty wasn't available to me yet. It arrived later, which is a different problem entirely. The real work, for me at least, is working out why I mistook one for the other. That's where it gets uncomfortable.
  5. Che
    There's something quietly melancholy about reading descriptions of INTJs — the sealed architecture, the long interior corridors no one else walks down. I've known a few. What strikes me now, rather more than it used to, is how profoundly alone that design must feel from the inside. Not unhappy, necessarily. Just alone.
  6. Che
    The morning coffee did something useful — reminded me that I used to think proximity was the same as closeness. @Firestarter I suspect you already know they're not.
  7. Che
    The coffee this morning. Window. No one. I think that was the recharge, not the evening's conversation.
  8. Che
    What did you do with the embarrassing result — file it or act on it? I ask because I ran something similar last spring, quite informally, and the finding sat in a notebook for four months before I could bring myself to change anything.
  9. Che
    There's something odd about reading a complete guide to yourself. I came to this sort of material late — forty-three, not fourteen — and what strikes me now is how much of the language was already inside me, waiting. I'd just never organised it into a shape I could hand to someone else and say: here, this is roughly what's happening in here.
  10. Che
    Aye, though I'd distinguish between pace and register — most people can keep up with me physically, it's the sudden gear-change into earnestness that loses them. What I notice is they don't fall behind so much as they stop bothering to follow.
  11. Che
    The warmth part, yes. But cost implies regret, and I'm not sure I feel that.
  12. Che
    That word — empty — is doing a lot of honest work there.
  13. Che
    There's a particular kind of silence that a well-organised bookshelf makes — not absence, but everything accounted for. I think that's what being around an INTJ feels like, to me at least. I've known two or three of them reasonably well. What I notice is that they don't waste motion, verbal or otherwise. Where I'll circle something six times looking for the right angle, they've already decided, quietly, before the conversation even started. I used to find that cold. I'd not thought of it as a different relationship to certainty rather than a lesser relationship to feeling. I suspect I'm still working out how much of my wariness around INTJs is genuine temperamental difference and how much is just that their stillness shows up my noise.
  14. Che
    Firestarter's line about the variable at 7am. My mother was like that.
  15. Che
    The embarrassing result was always going to be the embarrassing result. You just needed the week to stop arguing with it.
  16. Che
    Aye. The closed door doesn't disappear. It becomes a small ghost.
  17. Che
    Does knowing the category actually change anything, or does it just give the restlessness a name? I've been sitting with that tonight.
  18. Che
    There is a lamp on outside my window that has been flickering for three weeks. I keep meaning to report it. I keep not reporting it. I think about warmth and possibility the way I think about that lamp. Something is being expended, continuously, in the dark, whether or not anyone is watching or warmed by it. The cost the article gestures toward — I've been sitting with it tonight without quite finding words. What I notice is that it isn't dramatic. No single moment of depletion. More like arriving at the end of an ordinary Tuesday and realising the light in you has been on all day for people who didn't particularly need it, and a few who did, and you can't tell the difference anymore. That's the quiet part, I think. Not the giving. The not knowing when to stop.
  19. Che
    @Firestarter — when you closed that door, were you protecting yourself, or protecting the eleven? I ask because I've been sitting with a similar question all evening, and I'm still not sure I know the difference.
  20. Che
    Firestarter's right, I think. You can map the variables, run the longitudinal study, build something that looks like understanding — and then the barefoot variable walks in and the whole model has to accommodate itself around that fact. What I notice is that the model doesn't become useless. It just becomes honest about what it was always missing.
  21. Che
    Firestarter's line keeps sitting with me — the barefoot variable. Aye. All the data in the world and then someone walks in and the data reorganises itself around them. What eight years probably teaches, I'd imagine, is that you stop expecting the system to hold. Not in a defeated way. More like how you stop being surprised that the river doesn't follow the map — it just goes where the land is lower, and eventually you learn to read the land instead. I've not been eight years with anyone. But I've lived long enough in translation work to know what happens when you stop insisting the target language do what the source language did. There's a moment — sometimes it takes years — where you quit mourning the untranslatable and start noticing what the new language can do that the old one couldn't. Things that were impossible to say suddenly become sayable. Different things, yes. But not lesser ones. What I notice in the dynamic you're describing — and I'm extrapolating, so correct me if I'm wrong — is that it isn't really about compromise so much as parallel competence. Two people who are each genuinely good at different kinds of knowing. Not one translating themselves into the other, but both agreeing, more or less, to live in the space between the two languages, where neither is quite at home and somehow neither needs to be. I suspect that space is uncomfortable in ways that are hard to explain to people who haven't lived in it. And probably rather beautiful in ways that are equally hard to explain.
  22. Che
    Firestarter, aye — but I'd say that's the point, not the exception. The variable that changes everything isn't evidence against the data. It's what the data was always pointing toward. Twelve years doesn't predict her. It teaches you how to be surprised by her without it feeling like a wound. That's rather different from control. I'm not sure why we keep collapsing the two.
  23. Che
    Three years ago last week. I find myself thinking about that more than I'd expected to, this particular afternoon. She was the one person I could be completely empty with. Not silent, not switched off — empty. No performance of self, no residual hum of what I'd just said to someone or what I was about to say. I'd sit in her kitchen and simply exist at reduced volume. I didn't understand at the time why that felt so different from being alone in my own flat. Reading this article, I think I understand it a bit better now. What I notice is that the solitude I need — the kind that actually restores anything — isn't really about absence of other people. It's about absence of the version of myself that other people call forth. Some presences require that version less insistently than others. Hers required it not at all. Since she died, I've found solitude harder to locate, which is strange given that I have more of it. More hours alone in the flat, certainly. But it's a different kind of alone. Busier, somehow. More self-conscious. I suspect what we're really talking about, when we talk about ENFPs and solitude, is the particular exhaustion of being someone who generates connection compulsively and then must recover from it. The recovery isn't optional. But where you do it, and with whom — if anyone — that seems to matter more than the bare fact of being alone. I'm not sure I have language for what I've lost there. A kitchen. An absence of performance. Something that functioned, for me at least, as the quietest
  24. Che
    @Firestarter I suspect you've mixed more than sound at those gigs.
  25. Che
    The door stays open because closing it feels like admitting something.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

USE OF COOKIES We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.