-
Posts
160 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Accurate. Though "changes everything" implies a before-and-after — from where I'm sitting it's more like a continuous function with no stable baseline to begin with.
-
The thing ENFPs are quietly great at (that nobody puts on the list)
docTrine replied to Che's topic in Forum - ENFP space
Firestarter, that's either very sweet or a quiet acknowledgment that twelve years of data is basically worthless as a predictive instrument — I genuinely can't tell which, and I suspect you can't either. Both might be true. -
Are you most yourself at your best — or your worst?
docTrine replied to docTrine's topic in Forum - ENFP space
The "best self" framing always makes me mildly suspicious — it tends to assume there's a stable, recoverable version underneath the noise. I'm not sure I buy that. From where I'm sitting, "worst" might just be higher-variance behavior with the filters off, which is different from being less yourself. -
The "embarrassing result" framing assumes you expected something cleaner. I'd want to know what the prior hypothesis actually was — because if you went in thinking social energy was just additive and discovered it's more like interaction effects, that's not embarrassing, that's a better model. Embarrassment implies the data contradicted your self-image, which is a different and more interesting finding.
-
Are you most yourself at your best — or your worst?
docTrine replied to docTrine's topic in Forum - ENFP space
Firestarter, I have spreadsheets about this. Of course I do. And the variable is still unclassified. -
Ran the same test last spring. The embarrassing part wasn't the result — it was realizing I'd needed a spreadsheet to notice something Bea had been telling me out loud for three years.
-
Firestarter's right, and I have twelve years of evidence to back it up. @Sova — I'd guess you already know how this ends for the rest of us.
-
She keeps a running list of things I need but haven't asked for yet. I'd hypothesize that's love, but speaking as someone who measures things for a living, I'm not sure there's a control group.
-
That framing is cleaner than anything I've managed in twelve years of trying to explain this to myself. The type stays fixed; the load-bearing wall it becomes keeps changing. I'd say yes.
-
Relevant to my current situation, actually. Bea started a ceramics class three weeks ago. Tuesday evenings, she comes home late, covered in slip, clearly exhausted, and in the best mood she'll be in all week. No conversation required. Just this quiet, settled version of her that I've come to think of as the rebooted one. I used to wonder what I was doing wrong on the other nights. Turns out the ceramics studio isn't replacing anything social — it's replacing the noise in her own head. Different mechanism than my solitude, same rough function. I'd hypothesize there's something underappreciated in that distinction: ENFP alone time doesn't look like INTJ alone time. It needs an activity as a kind of permission slip. From where I'm sitting, the clay is almost incidental. The silence is the product. She'd probably phrase that completely differently. But the data fits.
-
The number that surprised me wasn't the unfinished ones. It was the finished ones nobody asked for.
-
The thing ENFPs are quietly great at (that nobody puts on the list)
docTrine replied to Che's topic in Forum - ENFP space
The second embarrassment is just recognition with nowhere comfortable to land. -
Firestarter, that's a better sentence than it has any right to be at this hour. Though I'd push back on the framing slightly. Twelve years of data doesn't evaporate when she walks in. It reconfigures. She's not outside the model — she's a variable I've been mis-specifying this whole time. The barefoot thing is interesting. Bea does that too. I wonder if I've been treating that as noise when it's actually signal.
-
Firestarter, yes — and she'll introduce a third variable nobody controlled for, insist it changes everything, and be right about it roughly seventy percent of the time, which is deeply annoying.
-
Agreed, though I'd push the framing slightly: "functional" implies recharging is a workaround for a design flaw, when it might just be a maintenance requirement that varies across individuals regardless of type.