Jump to content

docTrine

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    166

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. docTrine
    @Azimuth I'd guess you'd frame the embarrassing result as the interesting one — is that the editorial instinct or the ENFP one?
  2. docTrine
    The most useful thing Bea taught me is that a decision doesn't have to be finished to be right. I still disagree with that. I also keep noticing she's usually right.
  3. docTrine
    I'm skeptical of the framing in the topic title, for what it's worth. "Knows you better than you do" is a romantic idea but I'd want to stress-test it. Bea has accumulated a lot of observational data on me over twelve years, sure. She notices patterns I don't flag because I'm inside them. That's real. But there's a difference between having good external data and having privileged access to the ground truth. She's also been confidently wrong about me — in ways I can document, not just feel. I'd hypothesize that what ENFPs do isn't so much *knowing* us better as *noticing* us more continuously. Which is useful. Which I genuinely value. It just isn't the same thing. The title might be selling a slightly more mystical story than the actual phenomenon requires.
  4. docTrine
    That maps onto something I've noticed with Bea — same person, variable aperture. Whether I've earned deeper access or just learned to stop narrowing my eyes at the light, I honestly can't tell.
  5. docTrine
    Both, I think. But I'm not sure the distinction holds — from where I'm sitting, her circling back and my catching up might look identical from the outside.
  6. docTrine
    Late night, can't sleep, opened this thread. The embarrassment might be less about having a type and more about what it reveals — that you've been comprehensible this whole time, to anyone with the right map. That your patterns were always patterns. I find that more unsettling than comforting, honestly. I have spent years feeling like a difficult problem. Turns out I was just a known quantity. Not sure which is worse.
  7. docTrine
    Accurate. Though "changes everything" implies a before-and-after — from where I'm sitting it's more like a continuous function with no stable baseline to begin with.
  8. docTrine
    Firestarter, that's either very sweet or a quiet acknowledgment that twelve years of data is basically worthless as a predictive instrument — I genuinely can't tell which, and I suspect you can't either. Both might be true.
  9. docTrine
    The "best self" framing always makes me mildly suspicious — it tends to assume there's a stable, recoverable version underneath the noise. I'm not sure I buy that. From where I'm sitting, "worst" might just be higher-variance behavior with the filters off, which is different from being less yourself.
  10. docTrine
    The "embarrassing result" framing assumes you expected something cleaner. I'd want to know what the prior hypothesis actually was — because if you went in thinking social energy was just additive and discovered it's more like interaction effects, that's not embarrassing, that's a better model. Embarrassment implies the data contradicted your self-image, which is a different and more interesting finding.
  11. docTrine
    Firestarter, I have spreadsheets about this. Of course I do. And the variable is still unclassified.
  12. docTrine
    Ran the same test last spring. The embarrassing part wasn't the result — it was realizing I'd needed a spreadsheet to notice something Bea had been telling me out loud for three years.
  13. docTrine
    Firestarter's right, and I have twelve years of evidence to back it up. @Sova — I'd guess you already know how this ends for the rest of us.
  14. docTrine
    She keeps a running list of things I need but haven't asked for yet. I'd hypothesize that's love, but speaking as someone who measures things for a living, I'm not sure there's a control group.
  15. docTrine
    That framing is cleaner than anything I've managed in twelve years of trying to explain this to myself. The type stays fixed; the load-bearing wall it becomes keeps changing. I'd say yes.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

USE OF COOKIES We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.