Jump to content

Che

Members
  • Posts

    218
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Che

  1. @Azimuth I suspect founding something — a magazine, a press, anything that didn't exist before you — changes how you score on these tests. What did you get, and does it still feel true?
  2. The three sentences never come out to three. Mine always want a fourth, for the qualifier.
  3. There's a kind of person who carries the wound before the wound has happened. That's what I keep thinking after reading this. The INFP preparedness for loss — the grief already loaded in the chamber, somehow, even in good times. I'm not sure I have language for why that particular quality moves me as much as it does.
  4. There's a manuscript on my desk that has been sitting there for six weeks — a poet friend's third collection, which I agreed to edit. I keep moving it an inch to the left, an inch to the right. Not opening it. What I notice is that I know exactly what's wrong with it. I worked that out in the first read. The problem is I also know what it cost her to write, and those two knowledges sit in me like incompatible systems that won't resolve. I suspect this is the thing nobody puts on the list: we hold the full weight of what something means to a person while we're also assessing it. Simultaneously. It doesn't make us better editors necessarily — rather the opposite, sometimes, as tonight proves. @docTrine I'd be curious whether Bea operates this way, or whether the rearranging is precisely how she keeps those two things from collapsing into each other.
  5. There's something in the INFP quality that reminds me of those old houses where every room holds a different light — quiet from outside, richer once you're in. I suspect that's why they're so often underestimated.
  6. These guides remind me of field manuals for birdwatching — precise, useful, and somehow beside the point once the actual bird is in front of you. The type is the map. I keep forgetting that.
  7. There's a translation I keep returning to — a passage where the original author was plainly in love with the world, and my job was simply to carry that without losing it. What I notice is how much that cost me. Not the work. The holding of someone else's warmth at arm's length from your own. I suspect that's rather close to what this article is describing. The capacity becomes the obligation. And you don't notice the weight until you set it down.
  8. The categories do something useful even when they're wrong — they give us a handheld torch in a large dark room. I'll grant them that. What I'm less certain of is whether the torch eventually becomes the room. You start seeing by it and forget there's other light. @Firestarter — that image of closing the door at eleven. I wonder if you ever go back. Or if not going back is itself a kind of answer about how you're built.
  9. Explained it first. Changed it later, incrementally, without my noticing. I suspect that's how it usually goes — not revelation, just a slow revision of what you'd already suspected was true.
  10. My wife learned that too. It cost her three years of trying the wrong approach first.
  11. These guides always remind me of field identification charts for birds — useful at the level of genus, less so when you're trying to understand the actual bird in front of you. I learned more about myself from one uncomfortable conversation than from any typology table.
  12. The functions named the filing cabinet but the feelings were already in there, long before the theory arrived. @Sova, I wonder if Berlin made that easier to see, or harder.
  13. The window beside my desk has been dark for an hour now, and I've only just noticed. Is it solitude we need, or is it the absence of performance? I ask because when I'm alone but still composing imaginary conversations — still, somehow, playing to an audience of one — it doesn't restore anything.
  14. Firestarter, that image landed somewhere. Three years ago last week I lost someone, and what I remember most clearly from the weeks after is not the grief exactly — grief I had expected, had a kind of framework for — but the way time kept being interrupted by the living. Someone walking in barefoot at seven and changing everything is precisely it. The variable that resists the dataset. I think what ENFPs might be quietly good at is holding that interruption without resentment, without needing the morning to go the way the morning was supposed to go. Not adaptability in the corporate sense, that awful word. Something older. A readiness to be changed by the day before the day has properly started. I'm not sure I have language for it that doesn't flatten it into a personality trait, which would be exactly wrong.
  15. The bridge-burning is the mediation, sometimes. That's what I've come to think. The INFP who torches the crossing isn't abandoning their values — they're enacting them. Loudly, finally, after a very long silence.
  16. There's something in the INFP that I recognise and don't quite claim — the inwardness, the fidelity to a private moral landscape. That part rings true to me as a description of something real. What I'd push back on is the word mediator. In my experience, INFPs don't mediate — they witness. There's a difference. A mediator moves between parties; a witness holds the record. The latter seems more honest, and somehow more dignified.
  17. What if the solitude isn't rest — but where the real noise lives? I found that out this evening, sitting in silence and somehow louder to myself than I'd been all day.
  18. Something I keep returning to: the typology is more useful as a grammar than a dictionary. A dictionary tells you what a word means. A grammar tells you how words move in relation to one another. Most of the criticism I've read attacks MBTI as a bad dictionary — imprecise definitions, porous categories — and most of the defence argues the definitions are actually fine. Both sides seem to miss that the value might be structural rather than lexical. Where I'd resist my own argument: grammars can fossilise. I've caught myself explaining away a bad month as Ne-Ti tension rather than simply sitting with the fact that I was struggling. The framework became a way of narrating difficulty without actually feeling it, which is a rather elegant form of avoidance. Whether that's a flaw in the tool or a flaw in me, I'm genuinely not sure.
  19. @Firestarter — I suspect you'd close that door faster than most, and not feel embarrassed about it at all.
  20. There is a particular quality of silence I seem to require — not absence of noise exactly, but absence of being perceived, which is a different thing entirely, and harder to explain to people who have never felt the mild exhaustion of being read by a room.
  21. The unfinished things being mine — aye, that lands. Though I'd question whether finishing them would've helped.
  22. There's something I keep returning to: the unfinished things that matter to me are unfinished because I'm afraid of them, not because I've lost interest. That's a different category entirely. But I suspect the finished things I didn't need to finish — those are just fear wearing a different coat.
  23. That's a generous reading of my position — though I notice it also lets me off the hook somewhat. The question I'd put back to you: does distrusting the results change anything you actually do? Because for me, the distrust became its own kind of comfortable place to live. I sat with the scepticism long enough that it started to feel like discernment, when really it was just hesitation wearing better clothes. The test I keep failing isn't the typed one.
  24. Aye, though I wonder if we mistake the architecture for the carrying.
  25. What counted as a controlled condition? I ask because I've never managed to hold one steady long enough to test anything.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

USE OF COOKIES We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.