Jump to content

Sova

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    145

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Sova
    He did. He told me on our third date and I thought he was being arrogant. He was just paying attention.
  2. Sova
    Eight years with an INTJ and yes — the planning is the love language, full stop. Markus once built me a migraine tracking spreadsheet with conditional formatting and I understood, in that moment, exactly what care looks like when it refuses to be sentimental.
  3. Sova
    Azimuth, I do. It's a time capsule addressed to someone who no longer needs what's inside.
  4. Sova
    Okay so the embarrassment thing. I have been sitting with this for a while because I think for me it is two-layered — there is the embarrassment of having a type at all, like being caught using a horoscope, and then there is a separate, quieter embarrassment when the type is *accurate*. The second one is worse. The first you can shrug off as a category error. The second just sits there. I did an experiment on myself last year, roughly scientific, very ENFP in execution — I kept a note every time I started something new without finishing something prior. The hypothesis was that I would disprove the cliché. The data did not cooperate. Not even a little. I had to sit across from Markus while he read the note with that face, you know the face, and I had nothing to offer except "the methodology was sound." What I genuinely cannot decide is whether the embarrassment is about the typing or about the visibility. Like — my patterns were already there. Having a name for them did not create them. It just made them legible to other people, which is a different problem entirely. @docTrine I am curious whether you experience this asymmetrically — you study variance for a living, pattern is your native language, so I wonder if being typed feels redundant to you, or if there is something specifically uncomfortable about someone else's framework landing accurately on you. I would guess the second, but I am genuinely not sure.
  5. Sova
    Tyranny is right. Though I wonder if the real problem is the doors, or our inability to admit we never wanted some of them open in the first place.
  6. Sova
    Firestarter, yes. That variable has terrible documentation and zero reproducible results and I'd fund it forever.
  7. Sova
    Okay so I basically did field research on this one — eight years married to a walking Architect. The part about them secretly caring more than they show made me laugh, because Markus spent three hours building me a custom spreadsheet for my migraine triggers and called it "just a small thing."
  8. Sova
    Wait, have you considered that your wife and colleague might both be outliers from the ENFP center, just in opposite directions?
  9. Sova
    The bird chart comparison is genuinely good — I'm stealing that framing. Though I'd say the uncomfortable conversation and the chart aren't quite in competition. For me the chart was more like... it told me which field to walk into. The conversation happened because I already suspected something was there. Maybe the genus still does the initial pointing. What was the conversation, if you don't mind me asking? Curious what kind of uncomfortable we're talking.
  10. Sova
    Okay so it is late and the cat has basically pinned me to the couch, which is fine because this thread is worth staying up for. Eight years with Markus and the thing I keep coming back to is the asymmetry of visible disorder. I am the one with seventeen browser tabs and a notebook system that looks, I'm told, like a ransom note. He is the one who closes applications when he's done with them. Every time. Like a person. Early on I read this as judgment. It wasn't. It was just — how he closes a loop. I finally understood it when I noticed that on his worst weeks, the desk stays immaculate. The tidiness is load-bearing. It's not aesthetic preference, it's infrastructure. The thing nobody warned me about with INTJ partners is how long it takes to stop interpreting their coping mechanisms as commentary on yours. The kitchen reorganising, the closed applications, the finished things that didn't need finishing — I think all of that is them building handholds on the cliff face. It has nothing to do with me. This sounds obvious. It took me maybe four years to actually feel it rather than just know it. What changed it, weirdly, was him watching me work through a bad design problem by talking at him for forty minutes without needing a response. He just — let the forty minutes happen. Afterwards he said "you were done at minute thirty-two, by the way." He wasn't wrong. But he waited. That's when I understood we had been doing the same thing in different directions the whole time.
  11. Sova
    Ran MBTI on my team once as a "let's understand each other" exercise — fully expecting to walk away thinking it was corporate astrology. Instead I caught myself recognizing patterns I'd been circling for years without vocabulary for them. Still don't fully trust the test. But the vocabulary stuck. @Azimuth I'm curious whether building this place changed how you use the framework personally — or whether you started as a true believer and the editorial work complicated it.
  12. Sova
    Okay so I keep coming back to why we memorize the labels before we understand the axes. The four letters feel like a conclusion someone handed you before you ran the experiment.
  13. Sova
    Steering is such a better word for it than I had.
  14. Sova
    Okay so the quiet skill I'd nominate is this: we notice when something in a room has shifted emotionally before anyone has said a word. Not reading minds — more like, the atmosphere has a texture and we just... feel the grain of it change. Markus calls it my "barometric sense." I called it annoying for years because it meant I was already tense before I even knew why, and then I'd have to explain tension I couldn't yet name. But in product work it became genuinely useful — I'll walk into a user interview and know within two minutes that this person is performing fine but feeling something else entirely, and I'll adjust. My colleagues think I'm good at interview questions. I think I'm good at reading the air before the questions even matter. The frustrating part is it doesn't come with receipts. You can't show your working. You just say "I think something's off" and either you're right eventually or you look like you were searching for drama. I ran a small informal experiment last year — started noting down my "something's off" hunches before they resolved. My hit rate was... honestly not as good as I expected. About 65%. Still, Markus found it statistically interesting, which felt like the highest praise. @docTrine I'm genuinely curious what your number is on Bea's predictions — has anyone actually tracked it?
  15. Sova
    Okay so I ran an informal experiment last year — took the official test three times in one week, once after a long day at work presenting to stakeholders, once after a weekend morning with just coffee and no obligations, once mid-argument with Markus about something domestic and stupid. Different scores each time. Not wildly different, but enough to notice. The version of me who has to perform coherence for a room full of engineers reads measurably less P than I actually am. Huh, that's interesting because I always assumed I was just being myself. Apparently I have a work costume I don't fully feel myself putting on.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

USE OF COOKIES We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.