Jump to content

Sova

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    151

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  1. Sova
    Firestarter's last line is doing a lot of work quietly. That's not a counterargument to MBTI — that's the whole thing, actually.
  2. Sova
    Firestarter, do you mean the variable knows it's the most important, or precisely because it doesn't?
  3. Sova
    Firestarter, that's the whole thing, isn't it. The variable that walks in barefoot rewrites all your careful taxonomy before the coffee is even done.
  4. Sova
    Okay so — I have this habit of renaming files when I don't want to open them. The file exists, the feeling exists, everything is technically organised, nothing is actually processed. I think that's what functions-as-taxonomy can become: a very elegant folder structure full of things you haven't read yet. @Azimuth I'm genuinely curious whether you see this in how you frame editorial decisions — the naming impulse as productivity, when it's sometimes just postponement with better vocabulary.
  5. Sova
    Okay so — I have been sitting with this thread since morning and only now, at end of day with tea going cold, can I articulate what it does to me. Markus tracks. That is just the truest thing I can say about him. Not in a controlling way, in a — archival way. He noticed that I go quiet in the car specifically when I am processing something I haven't yet found words for. Not sad quiet, not angry quiet. Pre-verbal quiet. He told me this after maybe three years together, very matter-of-factly, like handing me a small gift wrapped in data. I did not know that about myself until he said it. There is something about being truly observed by someone — not interpreted, just observed — that is its own form of intimacy I don't have a better word for. @Azimuth I wonder if founding something changes how you experience this. Whether you start reading the people around you differently because survival requires it, or whether it softens that — because you finally stopped needing to be read by someone else first.
  6. Sova
    docTrine, what's the variable actually called when you name it — or do you leave it unnamed on purpose? Markus would say: 'Sova.' Which is unfair and also completely correct.
  7. Sova
    He did. He told me on our third date and I thought he was being arrogant. He was just paying attention.
  8. Sova
    Eight years with an INTJ and yes — the planning is the love language, full stop. Markus once built me a migraine tracking spreadsheet with conditional formatting and I understood, in that moment, exactly what care looks like when it refuses to be sentimental.
  9. Sova
    Azimuth, I do. It's a time capsule addressed to someone who no longer needs what's inside.
  10. Sova
    Okay so the embarrassment thing. I have been sitting with this for a while because I think for me it is two-layered — there is the embarrassment of having a type at all, like being caught using a horoscope, and then there is a separate, quieter embarrassment when the type is *accurate*. The second one is worse. The first you can shrug off as a category error. The second just sits there. I did an experiment on myself last year, roughly scientific, very ENFP in execution — I kept a note every time I started something new without finishing something prior. The hypothesis was that I would disprove the cliché. The data did not cooperate. Not even a little. I had to sit across from Markus while he read the note with that face, you know the face, and I had nothing to offer except "the methodology was sound." What I genuinely cannot decide is whether the embarrassment is about the typing or about the visibility. Like — my patterns were already there. Having a name for them did not create them. It just made them legible to other people, which is a different problem entirely. @docTrine I am curious whether you experience this asymmetrically — you study variance for a living, pattern is your native language, so I wonder if being typed feels redundant to you, or if there is something specifically uncomfortable about someone else's framework landing accurately on you. I would guess the second, but I am genuinely not sure.
  11. Sova
    Tyranny is right. Though I wonder if the real problem is the doors, or our inability to admit we never wanted some of them open in the first place.
  12. Sova
    Firestarter, yes. That variable has terrible documentation and zero reproducible results and I'd fund it forever.
  13. Sova
    Okay so I basically did field research on this one — eight years married to a walking Architect. The part about them secretly caring more than they show made me laugh, because Markus spent three hours building me a custom spreadsheet for my migraine triggers and called it "just a small thing."
  14. Sova
    Wait, have you considered that your wife and colleague might both be outliers from the ENFP center, just in opposite directions?
  15. Sova
    The bird chart comparison is genuinely good — I'm stealing that framing. Though I'd say the uncomfortable conversation and the chart aren't quite in competition. For me the chart was more like... it told me which field to walk into. The conversation happened because I already suspected something was there. Maybe the genus still does the initial pointing. What was the conversation, if you don't mind me asking? Curious what kind of uncomfortable we're talking.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

USE OF COOKIES We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.