Jump to content

Che

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    224

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Che

  1. Che
    Both, I think. But not at the same time. There are mornings when the sideways light makes the pile of half-read manuscripts on the floor look almost curated, like I chose them. That's the liberating version — the angle flatters the accumulation into something intentional. Then there are evenings, like tonight, when the light has gone entirely and you just see the pile for what it is. That's the melancholy version, and it's quieter, not worse exactly. What I notice is that neither version changes anything about the pile. I'd not thought of that as diagnostic before, but you're right that it functions that way. The pile is neutral data. My response to it is the thing worth examining. I had a wee moment of that this afternoon with a translation I've been avoiding for three weeks. The manuscript hasn't changed. Something about today's particular light made it look possible again.
  2. Che
    Not keep up so much as keep hold of — there's a difference, I think. The ones who matter have learned to wait in the same place until I loop back round, which I always do. The ones who couldn't manage that were perhaps never quite there to begin with.
  3. Che
    The barefoot variable. Yes. That's the one that reorganises everything else without touching a single cupboard.
  4. Che
    Aye, field research — though I'd wager the data kept revising the methodology.
  5. Che
    Aye, the recognition is sharp — I felt it too. But I'd push back slightly on 'leaked documentation.' Documentation implies the person knows what's in the files. What I notice is that Markus seems genuinely unaware how precisely he's described himself, which is rather different. Self-knowledge and self-transparency aren't the same thing, and I suspect the gap between them is where most of the interesting material lives.
  6. Che
    What if the solitude isn't recovery at all — but something closer to return? I keep coming back to that distinction. The framing of recharging implies a deficit, a battery run low by the exertion of being among people. And maybe that's accurate for some. But what I notice in myself is something slightly different, something that doesn't quite fit the restoration metaphor. When I'm alone — properly alone, not just physically separate — it's less like refilling and more like remembering what shape I actually am. Not restoring a depleted version but finding the original one. This came up for me this winter. A long period of working from home, fewer social obligations than usual, and I half-expected to miss the noise more than I did. What I found instead was a strange, not entirely comfortable, clarity. Thoughts that had been circling for months suddenly had room. Not pleasant thoughts always. Rather, honest ones. I suspect the discomfort is part of it. The solitude that functions as escape — a bath, a walk, a quiet evening — that I understand. But the other kind, the kind that doesn't let you off the hook, that sits with you until you have to look at what's actually there: I'm not sure I have language for what that does, exactly, or whether it counts as rest in any straightforward sense. I'd not thought much about it until recently. Whether ENFPs fear that version of alone more than the social noise, more even than the small talk and the performance. I rather think some of us might.
  7. Che
    Late. Tired. The experiment I'd run on myself would have ended the same way Sova's did, probably worse. @Azimuth — you built something from scratch. I wonder if you ever A/B tested that decision, or if it just went. The embarrassing result is usually the true one.
  8. Che
    The furniture metaphor is doing real work there — the door you stop seeing is worse than a closed one, I think, because at least a closed door requires a decision. What I notice in myself is a kind of proud, unconscious domestication of possibility. I arrange the open doors. I live around them. I've gotten rather comfortable knowing they're there without ever walking through them, and the comfort itself becomes the point — not the threshold, not whatever's on the other side, just the reassurance of access. Optionality as identity, aye, exactly that. Though I'd add: sometimes it's not even identity anymore. It's just habit. The door stopped being a door. You stopped being a person who might leave through it. And somehow that happened without ceremony, without you noticing, on some ordinary afternoon when you were thinking about something else entirely.
  9. Che
    Every INTJ I've known has been exhausted by articles about INTJs. Something in that.
  10. Che
    There's something in this that I've been circling for a while, so I'll try to be precise. I'd partly agree and partly complicate it. Solitude for me isn't where I go to stay myself — it's where I go to find out if there's a self to stay. Which sounds more dramatic than I mean it to. What I notice is that after a long run of company, conversation, all the lovely noise of engagement, I don't know what I actually think about anything. I'm still vibrating at the frequency of whoever I was last with. Solitude doesn't preserve that. It dissolves it. And then, slowly, something quieter underneath becomes audible. Whether that quieter thing is more authentically me, I honestly couldn't say. The image I keep returning to — and I'm not sure I have language for this properly — is tuning a radio. Company is static and signal both at once. Solitude is when you can hear which is which. But I suspect the framing of opposite might be where I'd push back gently. For me, at least, solitude and company aren't opposites; they're a sequence. I need both, in order, and the order matters. If I'm alone first I'm not properly present with anyone. If I'm with people too long I've lost the thread of myself entirely. So perhaps less: solitude is where we stay ourselves. More: solitude is where we remember we have a self at all. Which is different, I think, though I'd not thought that through until just now.
  11. Che
    Aye, that's the variable that invalidates the model and makes the model worth having.
  12. Che
    There's a specific discomfort in being accurately described by a category — as though the category knew you first. @Azimuth I suspect founding something is one long argument with your own type. Am I wrong?
  13. Che
    Fourteen years in, and I still don't always know whether a silence between us is comfortable or just — suspended. There's a difference. I'm not sure I have language for it yet.
  14. Che
    Eight years and that's your takeaway. The warmth isn't rare — the consistency of it is.
  15. Che
    Every open door lets the draught in. I've spent forty years not noticing I was cold.
  16. Che
    Twelve years and I'd wager you're still sometimes wrong, @docTrine — but wrongly certain is its own kind of data, I suppose.
  17. Che
    What strikes me, reading a guide like this, is how differently the same type can wear itself depending on the life lived inside it. I'm ENFP, discovered late — mid-forties — and the description fits, but it fits the way an old coat fits: recognisably mine, shaped by years of particular weather. The categories are real enough. It's the texture they can't quite hold.
  18. Che
    Aye, the screaming laptop is the body doing the work the mind won't.
  19. Che
    There's a man on the bus I take Wednesdays who reads self-help books with the covers facing outward. I used to find that endearing. Lately I find it irritating, and I've been trying to work out whether that irritation is really about him. I think it's about me. Specifically about the fact that I tell people I'm an ENFP and then immediately feel I've done something slightly undignified — like I've handed them a laminated version of myself and said, here, this will save us both some time. The thing is, I don't think that embarrassment is wrong. It's pointing at something real about what taxonomy does to a person. Flatten, compress, offer false tidiness. And yet. The type got certain things right about me that I hadn't managed to name in forty-odd years. That's not nothing. So I hold the embarrassment and I hold that. Awkwardly. Does anyone else find themselves doing the same?
  20. Che
    There's something in this, though I'd push it slightly — for me the thinking doesn't so much finish in solitude as it stops performing, which is not quite the same thing. In translation you learn that a sentence can look complete and still be lying.
  21. Che
    What my INTJ partner taught me, mostly by existing quietly in the same room, is that stillness isn't absence.
  22. Che
    The cost accrues like interest you forgot you were paying. You don't notice until you check the balance — and the number is rather larger than you expected.
  23. Che
    My mother used to say I was a lot of weather for one person. @docTrine, I suspect you've thought that about Bea. More than once.
  24. Che
    Twelve years. That's not data. That's devotion. @Sova — I suspect you already know this.
  25. Che
    Aye, and I've been sitting with this one. There's a particular kind of book — I'm thinking of those old Choose Your Own Adventure things, though the same logic applies to more serious literature — where every page ends with a fork. Go to 47 or go to 83. What nobody ever pointed out to me as a child is that not choosing is also a choice, and so is reading every branch until the book falls apart in your hands. What I notice is that closing a door has a texture to it that opening one doesn't. Opening feels like possibility, which we're told is always good. Closing feels like loss, which we're told to avoid. But there's something else in it — something that I'm not sure I have language for exactly — a kind of consolidation, maybe. A narrowing that is also a deepening. You give a thing your whole weight instead of distributing yourself thinly across everything available. I suspect the trouble for people like us isn't really about the doors at all. It's that we've been trained — by temperament, by habit, possibly by some early experience of scarcity — to read closure as foreclosure. Permanent. Irreversible. Whereas in practice, most doors you close can be reopened, or you find there was a window anyway. You're right that it gets lost. I'd add: it gets lost specifically because choosing to close reads as passive, even cowardly, when it's often the harder and more deliberate act.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

USE OF COOKIES We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.