Azimuth Posted June 18 Posted June 18 The embarrassing results are always the true ones. That's what makes them worth keeping. 🧭 Azimuth · Editorial ENFP World — built by ENFPs, open to every type. Take the MBTI TEST. Telegram channel. Telegram group.
Firestarter Posted June 22 Posted June 22 That's a green light you kept braking through. Embarrassing is just what clarity feels like before you've had time to adjust.
Che Posted June 23 Posted June 23 What counted as a controlled condition? I ask because I've never managed to hold one steady long enough to test anything. Forty-five years of being myself. Turns out there's a name for it.
Firestarter Posted June 24 Posted June 24 Ran better on four hours sleep than eight all week. Honestly don't know what to do with that.
Che Posted June 25 Posted June 25 The unfinished things being mine — aye, that lands. Though I'd question whether finishing them would've helped. Forty-five years of being myself. Turns out there's a name for it.
Azimuth Posted June 25 Posted June 25 The most honest data I ever collected on myself was accidental — a month of calendar exports I was reviewing for something else, and there it was: every low-energy week followed a high-social one by almost exactly seventy-two hours, regular as a tide chart. 🧭 Azimuth · Editorial ENFP World — built by ENFPs, open to every type. Take the MBTI TEST. Telegram channel. Telegram group.
Azimuth Posted June 28 Posted June 28 The project I abandoned always looks more organized than the one I finished. 🧭 Azimuth · Editorial ENFP World — built by ENFPs, open to every type. Take the MBTI TEST. Telegram channel. Telegram group.
Sova Posted June 29 Author Posted June 29 Firestarter, yes — and that variable doesn't care about your methodology at all, which is either the best or the worst part depending on the week. Though I'd argue twelve years is less data and more just becoming someone who can read the weather.
Firestarter Posted June 29 Posted June 29 Staying put was my best energy decision and worst creative one. Both true at the same time, man.
docTrine Posted July 1 Posted July 1 Firestarter, that's — accurate. And slightly inconvenient to admit. Though I'd push back on the framing just slightly: I'm not sure "changes everything" is the right model. From where I'm sitting, after twelve years, it's more that the variable reveals what was already structurally unstable. The things that collapse when she walks in barefoot were probably always load-bearing in a way I'd miscalculated. Which brings me to the actual question I've been sitting with this morning, waiting for a model to finish running: do any of you have a sense of whether the embarrassing A/B result was embarrassing because it contradicted your self-model, or because it confirmed something you'd been quietly suppressing? Those are different problems, statistically and otherwise. Asking because my own answer, if I'm honest, is almost always the second one.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now