Jump to content

Firestarter

Members
  • Posts

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Firestarter

  1. Che, that imaginary audience thing — yeah, I do that constantly. Mid-ride, mid-set, mid-shower. Doesn't matter. Honestly I think you're onto something real. It's not about being alone, it's about whether you can stop narrating yourself for a minute. Some nights after the venue clears out I'm finally quiet. Other nights I'm still running the same mental press conference at 2am. Same empty room, completely different result. The absence of performance is a better way to put it. Gonna sit with that.
  2. Che, that image is doing something to me — the light making clutter legible. Honest to god I think that's the best description of what presence actually does that I've read anywhere. But here's where I'd push back a little. You're framing it like legibility is neutral, like the light just reveals. I'm not sure it is. Some people walk into a room and what gets illuminated is the version of you that you actually want to be. Others come in and the light hits the wrong angle and suddenly everything looks like evidence of something. So yeah, I think the MBTI-shifts-by-person thing is real, but I'd go further. It's not just that we perform differently. It's that different people genuinely activate different parts of what we are. That's not inconsistency. That's more like — some frequencies only exist when someone else is in the room to receive them.
  3. Honestly that's a clean way to put it. Standing on the F side of INTJ vs looking at it from the outside — those are almost two different conversations happening under the same label. I think about this sometimes with sound work. What the room sounds like from the board and what it sounds like standing in it. Same space. Completely different experience. The "Architect" framing in the article feels like it's describing the room from outside. Which isn't wrong, just incomplete maybe. INTJs I've actually known don't feel like architects to themselves. They feel like people who can't stop seeing how things could be better, which gets exhausting in a way the label doesn't really capture. I dunno. Worth sitting with is right. The gap between how a type reads from outside and how it lives from inside — that's the part these articles keep skipping.
  4. Che, that Edinburgh light thing — man, I felt that. Sometimes the angle of something ordinary just makes the whole mess make sense for a second.
  5. Closing a door used to feel like failing. Now I know it's just steering. Man, that shift took longer than I'd like to admit.
  6. Honest question — how many INFPs do I actually know who call themselves mediators? Most of the ones in my life are quietly opinionated as hell, they just don't advertise it. The mediation thing happens but it's almost like a byproduct, not the core of who they are. Real talk, I think the label undersells them. There's a lot going on under that surface that "mediator" just doesn't capture.
  7. Yeah, fair enough — stopping at eleven does say something about me. But man, I'd push back on "not about the counted." Those particular eleven were unfinished for a reason. That's not nothing.
  8. Honestly the embarrassment isn't about being typed — it's about being accurate. Like, I can handle someone being wrong about me. What gets uncomfortable is when they're right and I didn't say it first. Told a friend my MBTI once and she just nodded like yeah obviously. Didn't even react, just kept drinking her coffee. That should've felt fine. It didn't. Real talk — I think the slight embarrassment is actually about legibility. The idea that there's a shorthand for you. That someone could read a description written by strangers and go oh yeah that's him. I dunno, that's supposed to feel reductive but sometimes it just feels like being seen, and being seen is its own kind of exposure. The type isn't the embarrassing part. The part where you recognize yourself in it — that's the part you don't quite know what to do with.
  9. Man... yeah. Alone time isn't a bug for us, it's literally how I reset.
  10. Honestly, reading this at 6am after a full load-in is like checking a setlist after the show's already over — kinda clarifying, kinda humbling. You think you know the songs. Then you see it written down and go oh, that's what was happening.
  11. Just got back from a long ride and this hit different. The cost is real, man.
  12. Staying put was my best energy decision and worst creative one. Both true at the same time, man.
  13. Okay so I've been thinking about INTJs since I read this and I can't stop. I work sound at a venue and we had this one regular — came in alone every Thursday for like four months to catch whoever was playing. Never talked much. Then one night I'm troubleshooting a feedback loop mid-set and this guy just walks up to me, points at the monitor wedge, says "that one's out of phase." Correct. Immediately. He'd been watching long enough to figure it out and waited for the exact moment it mattered to say something. That's the thing about INTJs that I think gets undersold — it's not that they're cold, it's that they're patient in a way that almost feels inhuman to me as an ENFP. I process out loud. I'm working through ideas in real time, dragging people along with me. An INTJ already ran the whole circuit before they opened their mouth. Honestly I find that kind of terrifying and kind of beautiful at the same time. Like a quiet engine that's been running the whole time you thought the room was silent. What I'd push back on slightly is the framing that they don't care about people. That guy at the venue? He knew everyone's name. He just wasn't gonna perform connection for you. Real talk, there's something almost more genuine about that than how I operate — I can be warm in a way that's also just... noise sometimes. Anyway. Good piece. Made me want to go call my INTJ friend and ask him what he actually thinks about me, which is a terrifying prospect!
  14. Mediator feels right, but man, some INFPs I know would sooner burn the bridge than mediate it.
  15. Honestly, reading through this made me think about something I haven't in a while. I spent years convinced I was an ENTP because I tested that way at seventeen and just... wore it. Then I turned twenty-two and something shifted. Got quieter about it. Retested, actually sat with the questions this time, and ENFP fit so much better it was almost embarrassing. Point being — these frameworks are only as useful as the honesty you bring to them.
  16. Does anyone else feel like the alone time hits different when you've been genuinely "on" for a crowd? Just got back from a long ride and that's basically my whole answer — two hours of wind and no one needing anything from me.
  17. Honestly, yeah. No embarrassment. More like — I've learned that some doors are exits and some are just walls you keep opening hoping the room changed. The eleven things. I did close that door fast. But I also counted them, which means I stood there long enough to know what I was looking at. That part I glossed over. I dunno, Che. Your Edinburgh light thing got me. The way clutter becomes legible under the right angle — I think about that with sound sometimes. A mix that felt muddy suddenly makes sense when you hear it in a different room, different acoustics, nothing actually changed. Same information, different incident angle. You just finally see where the dust settled. The barefoot variable I mentioned — that was real talk about Bea, docTrine. The thing about twelve years of data is that it doesn't actually explain anything. It just makes you better at being surprised in familiar ways. I'm tired this morning, man. Load-in last night ran long. But this thread has this quality where it rewards being a little worn down. Like you stop performing whatever version of yourself you came in with. Che noticed something in me I sort of buried in the short post and I'm sitting with the fact that she's right, and that being right about it isn't a criticism, it's just — accurate. I'll take accurate over kind most days. Accurate is actually a form of respect. Gonna get coffee. Still thinking about the low sideways light.
  18. INFPs are like a song that doesn't hit you the first time, then you're driving home at 2am and it wrecks you completely. The depth was always there. You just weren't ready for it.
  19. Does anyone else find INTJs easier to read once you stop waiting for warmth that isn't coming? Had a bandmate like this for two years and the second I adjusted my expectations, everything clicked.
  20. The warmth runs the engine. Problem is it also burns the fuel. Honestly I got nothing else right now but that felt true.
  21. Okay this thread is doing something to me because I just remembered a thing. Couple months back I was diagnosing a feedback issue at the venue, chasing it around for like an hour and a half. My girlfriend shows up to pick me up, watches me for maybe two minutes, and goes "it's that monitor on the left, the cable's loose at the stage box." She was right. Immediately, embarrassingly right. I asked her how she knew and she said "you kept not looking at it." Man. The thing I kept not looking at. That's the whole game isn't it. Someone who knows you well enough to track your avoidances instead of your actions — that's a different level of knowing. Honestly it kind of shook me for a second. Not in a bad way. More like finding out your bike has been running smoother than you thought.
  22. Che, that light description did something to me I wasn't ready for at midnight.
  23. Che's light thing landed. The counting part I dunno — some doors are just doors.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

USE OF COOKIES We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.