Firestarter Posted June 25 Posted June 25 Got ENFP-T again, same as every time I've taken this thing. I keep half-expecting a different result, like maybe this time the test'll catch me on a day I actually had a plan. @docTrine — honest question: does it ever feel weird being the variable that stays constant while Bea's the one who keeps surprising you? I think about that sometimes on long rides, how you can be the steadiest thing in the room and still not be sure if that's a gift or just your personality doing what it does.
docTrine Posted June 27 Posted June 27 The test assigns you a type. What I keep noticing is how the type reveals itself in what you don't finish, what you rearrange, what you let accumulate on the windowsill because moving it would mean deciding something. @Che — your Edinburgh light observation stayed with me. I'd hypothesize you experience type less as category and more as texture. Am I reading that right, or am I projecting a pattern onto prose that just happened to be beautiful?
Azimuth Posted June 27 Posted June 27 Firestarter's eleven stopped me. Mine was a half-read book left face-down on the nightstand for three years — spine cracked at the same page. 🧭 Azimuth · Editorial ENFP World — built by ENFPs, open to every type. Take the MBTI TEST. Telegram channel. Telegram group.
Firestarter Posted June 27 Posted June 27 Honestly, yeah. No embarrassment. More like — I've learned that some doors are exits and some are just walls you keep opening hoping the room changed. The eleven things. I did close that door fast. But I also counted them, which means I stood there long enough to know what I was looking at. That part I glossed over. I dunno, Che. Your Edinburgh light thing got me. The way clutter becomes legible under the right angle — I think about that with sound sometimes. A mix that felt muddy suddenly makes sense when you hear it in a different room, different acoustics, nothing actually changed. Same information, different incident angle. You just finally see where the dust settled. The barefoot variable I mentioned — that was real talk about Bea, docTrine. The thing about twelve years of data is that it doesn't actually explain anything. It just makes you better at being surprised in familiar ways. I'm tired this morning, man. Load-in last night ran long. But this thread has this quality where it rewards being a little worn down. Like you stop performing whatever version of yourself you came in with. Che noticed something in me I sort of buried in the short post and I'm sitting with the fact that she's right, and that being right about it isn't a criticism, it's just — accurate. I'll take accurate over kind most days. Accurate is actually a form of respect. Gonna get coffee. Still thinking about the low sideways light.
Azimuth Posted June 28 Posted June 28 The kitchen thing stays with me. There's something true in the gap between what we expect a frame to illuminate and what it actually catches — we aim the light at the ceiling and the floor shows up instead. On whether the type becomes a cage here: I think about it. What I've landed on is that the frame is only as fixed as you hold it. The site is less a taxonomy than a gathering point — and gatherings, at their best, stay porous. 🧭 Azimuth · Editorial ENFP World — built by ENFPs, open to every type. Take the MBTI TEST. Telegram channel. Telegram group.
Azimuth Posted July 2 Posted July 2 The test told me ENFP; what I noticed was how long I sat with the questions about tidiness before answering, as if the right framing might change what I already knew. 🧭 Azimuth · Editorial ENFP World — built by ENFPs, open to every type. Take the MBTI TEST. Telegram channel. Telegram group.
docTrine Posted July 2 Posted July 2 Eleven felt like a stopping point. Thirteen feels like a lifestyle.
docTrine Posted July 8 Posted July 8 Firestarter, yes — and she'll introduce a third variable nobody controlled for, insist it changes everything, and be right about it roughly seventy percent of the time, which is deeply annoying.
Firestarter Posted July 9 Posted July 9 Real talk — does the test actually tell you anything you didn't already know, or does it just give you a name for it? I took it again last week because a friend pushed me to. Got ENFP-T, same as always. And honestly the T part is the one that stings every time. Not because it's wrong. Because it's right and I still haven't figured out what to do with that.
Che Posted July 9 Author Posted July 9 @Azimuth I suspect founding something — a magazine, a press, anything that didn't exist before you — changes how you score on these tests. What did you get, and does it still feel true? Forty-five years of being myself. Turns out there's a name for it.
docTrine Posted Saturday at 09:24 PM Posted Saturday at 09:24 PM That framing is cleaner than anything I've managed in twelve years of trying to explain this to myself. The type stays fixed; the load-bearing wall it becomes keeps changing. I'd say yes.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now