Che Posted June 18 Posted June 18 The radiator in my study has been making a sound for three weeks — a low, rhythmic knocking I'd stopped noticing until my wife mentioned it this morning. She's been logging it, apparently. Not consciously. Just the way she logs everything. She does the same with me. Last winter she said I withdraw from people not when I'm hurt but specifically when I feel I've disappointed them. I told her that wasn't right. I had a whole counter-argument. Eighteen months later I can see she was describing me with a precision I didn't have the angle to achieve myself. I've started thinking this is structural, not just a matter of knowing each other well. Her Si holds a long, stable record of observed behaviour across time. My Ne is always pivoting forward, making new connections, and it simply doesn't look back at the data the way she does. She sees the pattern in the repetition. I don't even notice I'm repeating. It's a strange thing, to be a more accurate document in someone else's memory than in your own. I'm curious whether others have this. Someone in your life — partner, parent, old friend — who describes you in a way that initially feels wrong and later proves uncomfortably right. And if you know their type now, has that changed how you receive what they say? Whether you dismiss it less quickly, or sit with it longer before arguing back? For me, at least, knowing she leads with Si has made me more willing to let her observations stand for a while before I decide they don't fit. Forty-five years of being myself. Turns out there's a name for it.
Firestarter Posted June 19 Posted June 19 @docTrine bet Bea already knows which decisions those are too.
Firestarter Posted June 26 Posted June 26 Okay this thread is doing something to me because I just remembered a thing. Couple months back I was diagnosing a feedback issue at the venue, chasing it around for like an hour and a half. My girlfriend shows up to pick me up, watches me for maybe two minutes, and goes "it's that monitor on the left, the cable's loose at the stage box." She was right. Immediately, embarrassingly right. I asked her how she knew and she said "you kept not looking at it." Man. The thing I kept not looking at. That's the whole game isn't it. Someone who knows you well enough to track your avoidances instead of your actions — that's a different level of knowing. Honestly it kind of shook me for a second. Not in a bad way. More like finding out your bike has been running smoother than you thought.
Firestarter Posted July 2 Posted July 2 Che, that Edinburgh light thing — man, I felt that. Sometimes the angle of something ordinary just makes the whole mess make sense for a second.
docTrine Posted July 8 Posted July 8 Firestarter, that's a better sentence than it has any right to be at this hour. Though I'd push back on the framing slightly. Twelve years of data doesn't evaporate when she walks in. It reconfigures. She's not outside the model — she's a variable I've been mis-specifying this whole time. The barefoot thing is interesting. Bea does that too. I wonder if I've been treating that as noise when it's actually signal.
Firestarter Posted July 8 Posted July 8 My girlfriend reorganized my record collection once. I didn't ask her to. She just knew. @Che — does that kind of thing land differently when you're translating someone else's words for years?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now